November 25, 2020 – Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors today announced two positive developments for its client, 250 Fourth Development L.P. (“Hotel Owner”), in its dispute with Virgin Hotels San Francisco (“Virgin Hotels”). In sum, the court issued two important decisions. First, the court overruled Virgin Hotels’ attempts to avoid having to face Hotel Owner’s claims against Virgin Hotels for damages done to the project before Owner terminated the management agreement. Second, on November 20, 2020, the court denied Virgin Hotels’ efforts to freeze more than $2 million of Hotel Owner’s property. The case now proceeds toward trial.
The underlying legal dispute began on May 6, 2020, when Virgin Hotels filed a lawsuit alleging the Hotel Owner’s termination of the Hotel Management Agreement (“HMA”) on April 8, 2020, violated that agreement. On July 16, 2020, the Hotel Owner filed its Original Cross-Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco. A month later, on August 19, 2020, the Hotel Owner filed its First Amended Cross-Complaint, alleging that Virgin Hotels made numerous misrepresentations to Hotel Owner by, among other things, knowingly overstating Hotel gross revenues to inflate its management fee and misrepresenting bonus amounts due to Hotel employees. As a result of the alleged fraud and mismanagement, the Hotel Owner claims the loss of tens of millions of dollars in unrealized hotel profits and the lost value of the property.
In total, the Hotel Owner asserts five causes of action against Virgin Hotels, including breach of contract and fraud. Virgin Hotels demurred, or moved to dismiss, the claims. On October 30, 2020, the court entered an order overruling the demurer in its entirety, vindicating each and every one of the Hotel Owner’s claims. In so doing, the court noted that the First Amended Cross-Complaint “adequately pleads constructive fraud.”
“Our client is grateful that this case is moving forward and is eager to proceed to trial,” said William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer and counsel to 250 Fourth Development, L.P. “For years, our client put faith in Virgin and its assurances that it was creating a first-class brand. Our client believes that not only has Virgin failed to create the ‘promised brand,’ it grossly mismanaged the San Francisco property in an effort to boost Virgin Hotels’ own bottom line.”
After failing to obtain dismissal of Hotel Owner’s claims, Virgin Hotels filed an application for a writ of attachment on Hotel Owner’s property – to secure what Virgin Hotels claimed was over $2 million in expenses that Virgin Hotels had either paid or was owed to third parties. On November 20, 2020, the court denied this request in its entirety.