Biote Faces Claims for Misappropriating Name, Image or Likeness of Actress

Dallas, TX…November 21, 2024 – A lawsuit filed by Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors client and actress Cindy Latch in Dallas County court alleges that Biote Medical, LLC and its affiliated practitioners used Latch’s name, image, or likeness (“NIL”) to promote the company without Latch’s consent.

The case, which provides insights into often misunderstood NIL arrangements, is the latest in a string of high-profile lawsuits involving Biote and its executives. The complaint alleges that Biote continues to leverage Latch’s NIL to promote the company’s hormone therapy products without compensating her and in violation of her legal rights.

Filed on November 15, 2024, in Dallas County, the lawsuit alleges breach of contract, invasion of privacy by misappropriation, negligence, and violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, among other violations of various state acts protecting Latch’s right to control her NIL. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to restrain Biote, its affiliates, and practitioners from using her likeness to further the company’s business. The lawsuit also seeks damages in excess of $10 million.

Latch, a highly regarded actress, has worked as an infomercial host, appearing in commercials for many major brands, including Chase Bank, AT&T, and American Airlines. According to the complaint, Latch notified Biote that it was improperly using her likeness even though its right to do so had expired.

“Our client’s currency is her personal brand,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer and counsel to Ms. Latch. “As is customary, she entered into an agreement to allow Biote to use her image and likeness. Unfortunately, Biote continues to use Plaintiff's personal brand while simultaneously denying her just compensation.”

The lawsuit says, “Plaintiff, like all other actresses, does not allow her image and likeness to be used for free.” Latch seeks to ensure that Biote abides by its agreements and concludes that, “Without strict enforcement of her contractual agreements and privacy rights, Plaintiff knows that her brand loses its value.”

The lawsuit alleges that Latch filmed the Biote appearance in 2013. She entered into an Image Usage Contract with Biote, laying out terms that include the cost of use. The contract was automatically renewed, and Latch was paid from 2013 through 2021. According to the complaint, this is when the trouble began.

Latch alleges that in 2021, Biote began refusing to honor the contract terms, and yet continued to use her image and likeness in its corporate marketing. In March 2021, Latch sent Biote CEO Terry Weber an invoice and links to Biote-affiliated websites – to confirm the continued to use her image.

According to the lawsuit, two months later, in May 2021, Biote Chief Digital Officer Kevin Key told Latch, untruthfully, that Biote was no longer using her likeness and that any continued use was not the company’s responsibility.

Key wrote to Latch that, “You’ve been erased from existence inside the Biote walls, your image or any likeness thereof has been permanently deleted.”

In September 2024, Latch again contacted Weber and asked Biote to cease use of her image. As of today, several certified Biote providers and practitioners are still using Latch’s NIL to promote the sale of Biote’s products. Plaintiff plays a visible and starring role in Biote corporate marketing:  the lawsuit includes links to footage of the commercial branding in question. 

The lawsuit states that, “While in breach, Biote evaded Ms. Latch’s requests to remove her image from Biote affiliated website. Further, Biote refused Ms. Latch payment for the use of her image in accordance with the renewal terms of the contract.”

Brewer Foundation, NYU Announce “Top 64” for Global Debate Contest

November 6, 2024 – The Brewer Foundation today announced the “top 64” teams for the 24th annual International Public Policy Forum (IPPF). Sponsored by the Brewer Foundation and New York University, the IPPF is the first and only competition that gives high school students around the world the opportunity to engage in written and oral debates on issues of public policy.

This year’s qualifying round involved submissions from 283 teams representing schools in 26 countries and 30 U.S. states. This is the second-largest year in competition history.

Teams drafted essays in the affirmative or negative on the topic, “Resolved: Equitable access to pharmaceuticals should be prioritized over protecting intellectual property rights.” The advancing 64 teams will now compete in a written, single-elimination debate tournament – as teams advance through the rounds with a chance to earn an all-expenses-paid trip to New York City to compete in the IPPF Finals in May 2025. The overall winner is named the IPPF World Champion, receives the Brewer Cup, and is awarded a $10,000 grand prize.

Visit this link to see which teams advanced.

Miami Herald Reports on Lawsuit by BAC Client Lourdes Castillo Against Dori Foster-Morales

November 1, 2024 – The Miami Herald reports today on a lawsuit by Brewer client Lourdes Castillo against former Florida Bar President Dori Foster-Morales and her law firm. As reported, Castillo alleges that the firm’s legal malpractice, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with her divorce proceedings cost her more than $1 million.

“The complaint says it all: when our client’s divorce proceedings became complex and contentious, she retained defendants to protect her interests,” said Brewer partner William A. Brewer III. “Unfortunately, defendants were regularly unprepared for key court and arbitration events, caused Ms. Castillo to unwittingly waive substantial rights, and abandoned her during the most important time of her life.”

Brewer told the Herald, “defendants do not appear to dispute any of the claims and allegations against them – choosing instead to peddle a false narrative about fee arrangements involving a former client. Ms. Castillo is shocked by the conduct and the notion that a law firm would so blatantly disregard its professional obligations.”

Law360 Reports on Lawsuit Against Former Florida Bar President

October 21, 2024 — Law360 reports on a lawsuit by Brewer client Lourdes M. Castillo against Dori Foster-Morales and her law firm in an article titled, "Ex-Florida Bar Prez Accused of Malpractice in Divorce Case." As reported, Castillo is a former Foster-Morales' client who alleges Foster-Morales "breached her duty by dragging out the proceeding and causing damages stemming from a disagreement over a marital residence."

Filed in Miami-Dade County Civil Court, the four-count complaint accuses Ms. Foster-Morales, a former Florida Bar president of breach of contract, breach of duty, malpractice, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. 

Brewer Managing Partner William A. Brewer III told Law360 that the defendants failed to protect his client's rights.

"The complaint says it all: when our client's divorce proceedings became increasingly complex and contentious, she retained defendants to protect her interests," Brewer said. "Unfortunately, they were regularly unprepared for key court and arbitration events, caused Ms. Castillo to unwittingly waive substantial rights, and abandoned her during the most important time of her life."

To read the full report (subscription required), click here. 

Daily Business Review Reports on Lawsuit Against Ex-Florida Bar President

October 18, 2024 — The Daily Business Review reports on a lawsuit filed by Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors client Lourdes Maria Castillo against the law firm Foster-Morales and its founder, former Florida Bar President Dori Foster-Morales. According to the report, Castillo claims that, "despite Foster-Morales assuring Castillo of her skills, the defendant failed to exercise a reasonable standard of care and competence and breached fiduciary duties while representing her." 

"The complaint says it all: when our client's divorce proceedings became increasingly complex and contentious, she retained the defendants to protect her interests," says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer and counsel to Castillo. "Unfortunately, they were regularly unprepared for key court and arbitration events, caused Castillo to unwillingly waive substantial rights, and abandoned her during the most critical time of her life."

Among other things, the report states that Castillo claims Foster-Morales "pressured her to accept a buyout of the marital residence from her ex-husband for half the property's value, threatening to withdraw as counsel if Castillo refused to accept an immediate settlement."

The report notes that Castillo rejected the offer. Castillo retained new counsel and secured a global settlement of all claims for nearly $1 million more than the defendants had urged her to accept. 

Castilllo is seeking damages in excess of $1.1 million. Read more here.

William Brewer Writes in The Dallas Morning News About Texas School Accountability Case

October 15, 2024 — William Brewer III writes in today’s Dallas Morning News opinion section that Texas school accountability ratings should be released, and shares that the Brewer Foundation Future Leaders Program (FLP) intervened in a court case in support of doing so.

The text of the piece follows:

The “Texas miracle” is an often-told tale of unbridled economic expansion and explosive population growth.

But as new residents flock to our state — an estimated 470,000 last year — many public schools in Texas are failing to adequately educate the children already here. It is no “miracle” when most of Texas students attending public school did not meet grade level on the state STAAR exam last year, including 64% of Black children, 58% of Hispanic children and 62% of economically disadvantaged students who did not, according to the Texas Education Agency.

Unfortunately, rather than a united determination to fix the situation, battle lines are emerging in the community — and in the courtroom. A monumental fight is taking place in state court that will determine whether parents can easily access information evaluating the student performance at schools that their children attend. Incredibly, the answer from a Travis County judge may be “No,” as she recently blocked the release of such data after five school districts sued Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath.

School and district ratings should be released, for the sake of transparency and accountability. Doing so represents the first step in addressing the state’s educational crisis. Such information informs educational choices parents make for their children. Information is power, and the effort to suppress it is a detriment to educational progress and the future generations of our state.

That’s why the Brewer Foundation Future Leaders Program, which supports students from a dozen Dallas ISD schools, is among the parties that intervened in the case in support of releasing school ratings. Programs like the FLP, parents and community stakeholders need to access such information and use it to empower them to make critical educational decisions.

School districts are taking divergent paths in the legal action over the release of Texas public school accountability ratings, with some districts, such as Dallas ISD, voluntarily releasing their projected ratings.

Texas has more than 1,200 school districts, and yet just 33 districts that have now joined the lawsuit are blocking the release of ratings for all districts.

Of those school districts, 27 performed worse than the state average when it comes to students meeting grade level in 2023, according to TEA data on STAAR performance by school district. While scrutiny often focuses on large urban school districts such as Houston and Dallas, the plaintiff districts in the lawsuit demonstrate that many rural districts and exurb communities are struggling and failing to adequately educate children.

For example, in 2023, Kingsville ISD enrolled 2,694 children and only 27% met grade level on the STAAR exam across all grade levels and subjects tested.

We must invest in public schools and commit to making them better. They are part of the fabric of our state and will always remain so. In 1876, the Texas Constitution wisely declared that it was the duty of the state Legislature to support and maintain “an efficient system of public free schools” given the essential role of a “general diffusion of knowledge.” We must resist the urge to turn the accountability case into a referendum on vouchers.

The immediate impulse may be to penalize these failing districts. Instead, let’s talk about solutions: schools need adequate funding to address challenges to student achievement.

Many studies report that Texas is not funding its public schools adequately. An August 2024 report by Rice University’s Kinder Institute found that 73% of Texas public schools are underfunded and that districts with the larger funding gaps tend to have the lowest student achievement ratings from the TEA. The report concluded that “severely underfunded” school districts were “strongly associated” with ratings of “C” or worse. The correlation comes as no surprise.

Let’s consider the findings of the accountability ratings a galvanizing force. Within every district, we should promote transparency, address academic and financial shortcomings, and share best practices, all benefits of the ratings process. Only then can we live up to our larger-than-life story of the Texas miracle.

William A. Brewer III is managing partner of the Brewer Storefront and founder of the Brewer Foundation Future Leaders Program. Katherine Leal Unmuth contributed to this article.

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com

Famed Texas Company AmeriTex Faces Lawsuit for Allegedly Falsifying Projections and Breaching Its Obligations to Equity Holder

Dallas, TX … October 3, 2024 – Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors announced today that its client, a former C-Suite executive of AmeriTex Holding, LLC (“AmeriTex”), the parent of AmeriTex Pipe & Products, filed claims against the company, its CEO Kevin Thompson, and director Thomas Murphy, alleging that key executives conspired to contrive financial information to avoid paying him “fair value” for his stake in the company. The filing also names the national accounting firm Marcum LLP and the law firm Kelly Hart & Hallman – both of which allegedly played a role in the claimed conspiracy.

Filed in the 456th Judicial District of Guadalupe County, Texas, on October 3, 2024, the claims lay bare the inner workings of a scheme to deny the executive, Christopher Podlasek, financial benefits to which he is entitled by creating phony projections which understate the multi-billion value of AmeriTex. According to the filing, defendants “manufactured a set of false financial projections (that wildly diverged from the projections AmeriTex recently used in the ordinary course of its business) to avoid paying Podlasek for his 1.5% equity interest.”

Founded in 2009, AmeriTex manufacturers water drainage products used in commercial construction and public works projects. The company rose to prominence as the largest player in Texas’ reinforced concrete pipe industry – which is key to the state’s exploding infrastructure needs and accounts for more than $1.2 billion in economic output.  According to the company, its three campus operations are larger than all its competitors’ storage areas combined.

The lawsuit claims that the phony financial projections were created at the same time AmeriTex presented differing, bullish forecasts to the most significant credit rating agencies in the world, including S&P and Moody’s, multinational financial institutions Bank of America and U.S. Bancorp, and institutional investors when it raised $530 million in an October 2023 high yield bond offering.  Months later, AmeriTex used the same bullish outlook to secure a new $155 million credit facility from Bank of America.

“Our client believes he was victimized by a scheme to avoid paying him ‘fair value’ for his stake in the company he helped build,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer and counsel to Mr. Podlasek. “Apparently, AmeriTex and its principals seek to keep financial benefits to which they are not entitled. Lost in the story of this Texas company is the way it attempted to devalue its worth and what it owes a former member of the company. It’s a disturbing tale for those in Texas who have witnessed AmeriTex secure state-funded projects, dominate key markets, and realize astronomical growth.”

The legal claims allege that AmeriTex recruited Podlasek to be Chief Financial Officer during a time of fiscal turmoil – to help it stabilize its back office and finance function, raise capital, and open new facilities. He did so successfully. During Podlasek’s tenure, AmeriTex grew its annual revenue from approximately $100 million to over $320 million. It also secured massive projects and embarked upon new markets – earning a glowing endorsement from Texas Governor Greg Abbott.

Seniors Scammed: Dallas CBS Affiliate Produces Story About Brewer Storefront Client

September 25, 2024 – CBS News Texas reports on how Brewer Storefront assisted client Shirley Ison–Newsome, 77, after she was the victim of a predatory financial scam like many seniors face. 

The investigation, “Caught in the Scam,” reports Ms. Ison-Newsome lost more than $50,000 after her bank, Chase, allegedly failed to warn her of fraudulent activity. She also said a bank employee at her local Chase branch promised her that her wire transfer to China had been caught and stopped in time, but days later she learned the financial transaction had gone through.  

With the help of the Brewer Storefront, the community service affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors, Ison-Newsome resolved a legal action with Chase to the satisfaction of the parties.  

"It can't be that at the end of the day that it is just too bad, especially when, importantly, [Ison-Newsome] was extremely vigilant,” said Brewer Partner Will Brewer IV. “She immediately alerted her trusted financial institution. That's everything that you would expect someone to do to fix the situation."