The Dallas Morning News Reports on Brewer Storefront Client, Lawsuit Against Chase Bank

January 25, 2023 – The Dallas Morning News reports that Brewer Storefront client Shirley Ison-Newsome, a former longtime Dallas Independent School District administrator, alleges she was the victim of a financial scam reported to JPMorgan Chase – and the bank allegedly failed in its obligation to protect her funds. Ms. Ison-Newsome has filed a lawsuit against Chase alleging negligence, among other claims.

The article, “Two elderly scam victims in Dallas demand Chase recover $55,000 in stolen funds,” reports that someone stole thousands of dollars from Ison-Newsome. She and another, unrelated female fraud victim reportedly alerted Chase to stop questionable withdrawals – but Chase contends the women authorized the transfers and can do little about it. Ison-Newsome’s lawsuit alleges that her bank account was drained by more than $51,000.

Ison-Newsome says she was on her computer when she received a notice she had been hacked and was provided a phone number to call. A phone representative said they could work with her bank to protect her account. She became uncomfortable with exchange, and went immediately to Chase Bank the next morning to file a report. She was assured by bank officials her money was still in her account, as she had timely reported the potential scam. Chase allegedly froze her old account, and helped her set up a new one – to protect her assets. Ison-Newsome says that when she logged into the new account about a week later, the money was gone.

“I worked all my life,” she said. “I paid my bills on time. I tried to do the right thing. I’ve been with Chase for over 20 years, and I trusted Chase.”

Houston ABC-13 Reports on Brewer Storefront Voting Rights Act Case

November 10, 2022 – ABC 13 Eyewitness News in Houston reported on a Voting Rights Act lawsuit brought by Brewer Storefront against Pearland Independent School District. Brewer Storefront is the community service affiliate of the Brewer law firm.  

The report notes that two parents, Storefront clients Dona Kim Murphey and Jessica Garcia Shafer, are suing the school district, challenging the at-large election system. The report adds that the lawsuit argues the election system denies fair representation to voters of color in the diverse district. The complaint claims that since 2018, 11 minority candidates have had an unsuccessful bid in the school board elections, including the plaintiffs.

The news station interviewed Brewer Partner William Brewer about the case. “We believe this election system violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, because it enables the majority to discriminate against, frankly, a very healthy minority," Brewer said.

The complaint in part states that, “"In practice, the at-large system discourages minority or minority-preferred candidates from seeking office, because it effectively functions as a white-controlled referendum on all candidates. In PISD, a bloc of white voters controls all seven trustee positions.”

To read more, click here.

Lawsuit Claims Pearland ISD Electoral System Violates Voting Rights Act of 1965

November 3, 2022 — Brewer Storefront filed suit in federal court on behalf of plaintiffs Jessica Garcia Shafer and Dona Kim Murphey against the Pearland Independent School District (PISD) and its trustees, alleging that the school district’s election system violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because it denies fair representation to voters of color. 

Filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, the lawsuit claims that the school district’s at-large voting system denies Hispanic, African American and Asian voters a fair opportunity to elect school board representatives of their choice. The Storefront is the community service legal affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.  

The lawsuit alleges that, based on the district’s demographics, one would expect that at least one Latino, African American or Asian school board member could be elected. Yet, all seven school board members are white.

“Our clients believe the at-large election system used by Pearland ISD denies citizens of color a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer Storefront and lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “The at-large voting scheme utilized by the school district is pernicious and unconstitutional. Our clients believe the system should be abandoned – to enable a more inclusive future and where every citizen’s voice is valued in the process of electing school district board members.” 

Home to more than 21,000 students, PISD is a richly diverse school district. As of the 2020-21 school year, students of color formed nearly 67% of the total student body, according to the Texas Education Agency (“TEA”) 2020-21 Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR). About 33% of all PISD students were white, 36.8% Hispanic, 11.1% Asian, 14.9% African American, and 3.9% two or more races.

Under the current electoral system, school board members are elected at large. Candidates run for “places” but do not represent any specific geographic area. The lawsuit claims the at-large system rewards white voters for voting as a bloc and denies political opportunity to non-white voters.  

Shafer, who is Hispanic, and Murphey, who is Asian, both previously ran for the PISD school board and lost – Shafer in 2020 and 2021, and Murphey in 2019. They are also mothers whose children attend PISD schools. Ms. Murphey holds an MD PhD and Ms. Shafer is a trained epidemiologist.  They both lost to white candidates who allegedly benefited from the at-large voting system.

In referring to PISD’s at-large election system, the lawsuit states: “In practice the at-large system discourages minority or minority-preferred candidates from seeking office because it effectively functions as a white-controlled referendum on all candidates. In PISD, a bloc of white voters controls all seven Trustee positions.”

The lawsuit alleges that PISD has a history of minority candidates running for the board and losing to white candidates. Since just 2018, 11 minority candidates have run for the board and lost.

According to the lawsuit, the numbers of Hispanic, African American and Asian voters are sufficiently large and geographically compact such that at least one single-member electoral district could be created in which voters of color are a majority.

The lawsuit says, “The chilling effects of the at-large system empowers the current Board, which fails to reflect the composition of the real stakeholders in the public-school system.” The lawsuit adds, “PISD’s discriminatory voting system is a relic of the District’s past and must be changed.”

The Storefront has successfully challenged violations of the Voting Rights Act on behalf of other communities of interest in previous actions.  

The Storefront successfully resolved Voting Rights Act cases with the Richardson Independent School District in January 2019, the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District in 2015, and the Grand Prairie Independent School District in 2014. All districts now utilize remodeled voting systems. The Storefront also secured trial victories in Voting Rights Act cases against the Irving Independent School District in 2014, the City of Farmers Branch in 2012, and the City of Irving in 2009. Those lawsuits paved the way for the formation of new voting systems and the election of minority candidates.  

Mr. Brewer is joined in representing plaintiffs by Blaine Adams, an associate in the firm’s Dallas office.

Brewer Storefront Voting Rights Lawsuit Moves Forward

September 28, 2022 – The Brewer Storefront announced that its Voting Rights Act lawsuit against the Lewisville Independent School District (LISD) is moving forward. On September 26, U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant for the Eastern District of Texas denied a motion by LISD to dismiss the lawsuit brought against LISD by Brewer Storefront client Paige Dixon – paving the way for trial.  

Brewer Storefront is the community-service legal affiliate of the national litigation firm of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.

Dixon brought the lawsuit against LISD and its trustees on April 12, 2022, alleging that the school district’s at-large election system violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because it denies fair representation to voters of color. Dixon is African American and former candidate for the school board.

Judge Mazzant wrote that, “After reviewing the current complaint, and the arguments presented in briefing, the Court finds that Dixon has stated plausible claims for relief against Individual Defendants.”

With approximately 50,000 students, LISD is richly diverse.  As of the 2020-21 school year, the student population was 37.6% white, 30.5% Hispanic, 15.5% Asian, and 11.6% African American, and 4.4% Two or More Races. Yet, there is only one minority trustee out of seven.

“We are pleased that Judge Mazzant has cleared the path so that this important case can move forward,” said William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer Storefront and lead counsel for Dixon. “Our client is eager to proceed to trial, and expose the pernicious and unconstitutional nature of this voting scheme.”

Under the current electoral system, school board members are elected at large. Candidates run for “places” but do not represent any specific geographic area. The lawsuit claims the at-large system rewards white voters for voting as a bloc and denies political opportunity to non-white voters.  

The lawsuit refers to LISD’s at-large election system and the importance of school board trustees and states that, “Unfortunately, when the electoral process by which officials are chosen ‘stacks the deck’ against people of color such bodies cease to be ‘representative.’” According to the lawsuit, the numbers of Hispanic, African American and Asian voters are sufficiently large and geographically compact such that at least one single-member electoral district could be created in which voters of color are a majority.

The Storefront has an established track record in this form of public advocacy. It successfully resolved Voting Rights Act cases with the Richardson Independent School District in January 2019, the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District in 2015, and the Grand Prairie Independent School District in 2014. All districts now utilize remodeled voting systems. The Storefront also secured trial victories in Voting Rights Act cases against the Irving Independent School District in 2014, the City of Farmers Branch in 2012, and the City of Irving in 2009.

Those lawsuits paved the way for the formation of new voting systems and the election of minority candidates.  

Spectrum News 1 Reports on Brewer Storefront Voting Rights Case

On April 30, 2022, Spectrum News 1 reported on a voting rights lawsuit brought on behalf of plaintiff Paige Dixon by Brewer Storefront challenging Lewisville ISD’s system of electing trustees. The lawsuit argues that the election system violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and denies equal representation to people of color.

William Brewer, Dixon’s attorney, said that many Texas school districts are diverse but that is not reflected on school boards because of at-large voting systems used to elect trustees. “That means that if you have a voting [bloc] that is involved, turns out at the ballot box, that group can control the election of all seven seats,” he said.

Brewer said that similar lawsuits will continue to come up as the state grows and more school districts with at-large election systems have gaps in representation.

Dixon lives in Lewisville and ran for the Lewisville ISD school board last year and lost.

To read more, click here.

The Dallas Morning News, Other Media, Report on Brewer Storefront Voting Rights Case

On April 12, 2022, The Dallas Morning News and other local media reported on the Brewer Storefront lawsuit alleging that the at-large election system used to elect Lewisville ISD trustees violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because it denies fair representation to voters of color.

The Dallas Morning News published an article on the filing on the front page of the Metro & Business section of the newspaper on April 13. The Morning News reported that plaintiff Paige Dixon, who is African American and ran for the LISD school board, filed the suit.

The article quoted the lawsuit: “Ms. Dixon believes that the change from the at-large voting system to either a single-member districts or a cumulative voting system will empower people of color to run for Trustee positions, inspire greater electoral participation, and lead to a more equitable system of representation.”

Community Impact also reported on the filing, and quoted William Brewer speaking about the case.

“Our client represents a large number who believe the at-large election system used by Lewisville ISD illegally denies citizens of color a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing—trustees that represent their interests, schools and communities,” Brewer said. “Clearly, the school board should adopt an electoral process, which allows minority voters and community members to fairly participate in this vibrant, multiracial school district.”

NBC DFW also published a report on the filing.

Brewer Storefront News Release: Lawsuit Claims Lewisville ISD Electoral System Violates Voting Rights Act of 1965

Dallas, Texas…April 12, 2022 – Brewer Storefront filed suit in federal court on behalf of plaintiff Paige Dixon against the Lewisville Independent School District (LISD) and its trustees, alleging that the school district’s election system violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because it denies fair representation to voters of color. 

Filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, the lawsuit claims that the school district’s at-large voting system denies Hispanic, African American and Asian voters a fair opportunity to elect school board representatives of their choice. The Storefront is the community service legal affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.  

The lawsuit alleges that, based on the district’s demographics, one would expect that a Latino, African American or Asian school board member could be elected. Yet, all seven school board members, as they have been for years, are white.

“Our client represents a large number who believe the at-large election system used by Lewisville ISD illegally denies citizens of color a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing – trustees that represent their interests, schools and communities,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer Storefront and lead counsel for plaintiff Paige Dixon. “Clearly, the school board should adopt an electoral process which allows minority voters and community members to fairly participate in this vibrant, multiracial school district.” 

LISD is a richly diverse school district.  As of the 2020-21 school year, the student population was 37.6% white, 30.5% Hispanic, 15.5% Asian, and 11.6% African American, and 4.4% Two or More Races.

However, in addition to the all-white seven-member school board, LISD’s 16-member administrative “District Leadership Team” (including the interim superintendent) has only one person of color serving on it, a team comprised of 15 white members and one African American woman, and no Hispanic or Asian administrators.  

Under the current electoral system, school board members are elected at large. Candidates run for “places” but do not represent any specific geographic area. The lawsuit claims the at-large system rewards white voters for voting as a bloc and denies political opportunity to non-white voters.  

The lawsuit refers to LISD’s at-large election system and the importance of school board trustees and states that, “Unfortunately, when the electoral process by which officials are chosen ‘stacks the deck’ against people of color such bodies cease to be ‘representative.’”

The lawsuit alleges that, “The at-large system discourages minority-preferred candidates from seeking office because it effectively functions as a white-controlled referendum on all candidates where white voters control all seven Trustee positions.”

According to the lawsuit, the numbers of Hispanic, African American and Asian voters are sufficiently large and geographically compact such that at least one single-member electoral district could be created in which voters of color are a majority.

The lawsuit describes the significant “achievement gap” which exists between the lowest performing elementary schools in the district that are majority minority in enrollment and higher achieving schools situated in the neighborhoods in which the all-white members of the LISD board of trustees reside. 

Dixon, who is African American, is an active member of her community, a U.S. Army combat veteran, and a mother of two children who have attended LISD schools. She previously served as PTA President at Rockbrook Elementary School in Lewisville ISD from 2017 to 2021. She ran for Place 1 on the LISD school board in May 2021 and lost.

Ms. Dixon’s community involvement is extensive; in addition to her work as PTA President, she has been a member of the LISD Academic Calendar and Superintendent Parental Advisory committees; she chaired the LISD Council of the PTA’s Advocacy Committee; served as a volunteer coordinator of the LISD High School Band Booster Club; volunteered for Denton County Meals on Wheels; and is a member of the Concerned Citizens & African-American Parents (CCAAP).

Brewer Storefront previously brought a voting rights lawsuit against LISD in 2019 on behalf of plaintiff Frank Vaughan. The Court concluded that Mr. Vaughan, who is white, did not meet the definition of an “aggrieved person” under the VRA because his right to vote was not infringed “on account of his race.”

The Storefront has successfully challenged violations of the Voting Rights Act on behalf of other communities of interest in previous actions.  

The Storefront successfully resolved Voting Rights Act cases with the Richardson Independent School District in January 2019, the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District in 2015, and the Grand Prairie Independent School District in 2014. All districts now utilize remodeled voting systems. The Storefront also secured trial victories in Voting Rights Act cases against the Irving Independent School District in 2014, the City of Farmers Branch in 2012, and the City of Irving in 2009. Those lawsuits paved the way for the formation of new voting systems and the election of minority candidates.  

Brewer Storefront News Release - ADA Lawsuit Filed Against The Lamplighter School

Dallas, TX… April 6, 2021 – Brewer Storefront announced that its clients James and Michelle Hardt filed a lawsuit against The Lamplighter School in Dallas, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. 

The Hardts filed the lawsuit on April 5, 2021, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, on behalf of their daughter, who was denied re-enrollment at the independent school after being diagnosed with dyslexia and a speech and language disorder. The lawsuit alleges negligence and breach of contract. 

“The Lamplighter School portrays itself as welcoming and inclusive, but our clients believe that is a false representation when their child was asked to leave the school after being diagnosed with a learning disability,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer Storefront and counsel to plaintiffs. “Our clients believe the school failed their child – and the principles upon which it claims to operate as an educational institution.” 

Brewer Storefront is the community-service legal affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors. 

According to the complaint, the child was enrolled at Lamplighter for the 2017-18 school year and attended the school for three years. She was denied re-enrollment for the 2020-21 school year. The complaint alleges that the school failed to adequately monitor the child’s academic development and did not make accommodations in response to her learning needs. 

According to the school website, Lamplighter’s mission statement states that “Dedicated to igniting the potential of each child, Lamplighter engages children in the joy of learning through intellectual discovery in a creative, inclusive, and collaborative environment.” The school also promotes a “statement of inclusion.” 

According to the complaint, “Lamplighter simply neglected its obligations to accommodate the Child’s disabilities and directed the Child to leave and go to a different school.” 

The complaint continued, “Furthermore, the re-enrollment denial occurred after a documented, contractually agreed upon deadline for making such decisions – abandoning the Child and her family at a critical juncture in the Child’s formative years.”  

The complaint alleges that Lamplighter violated Title III of the ADA when it discriminated against the child because of the child’s disability. The complaint alleged that Lamplighter discriminated against the child by failing to reasonably accommodate the child and denying her enrollment in Lamplighter’s educational programs, and by denying the child the ability to participate in on-site therapy to remediate her disabilities, among other actions.    

“We believe this case is important for not only our daughter, but also all families who advocate for children with learning disabilities,” says James Hardt. “We believe accommodations could have been made in this instance, and we hope they will be made going forward for families who entrust Lamplighter with the education of their children.” 

Joining William A. Brewer III in representing plaintiffs is attorney Efrain Vera.